India’s decision to push Washington Sundar up the order to bat at number three against South Africa in Kolkata has sparked a strong debate, especially with the role traditionally being reserved for the most technically reliable batter. Sundar carries an impressive Test average close to 45 with multiple half-centuries and a hundred, yet many believe the No. 3 spot demands a specialist presence rather than a flexible all-rounder.
Cheteshwar Pujara, who held the position for more than a decade and defined its grit-first approach, shared his honest opinion during his appearance on Hindi commentary for Star Sports. When asked whether Sundar is the ideal long-term candidate, Pujara was firm in his assessment and suggested that the move may not be strategically sound.
Pujara expressed that Sundar’s dual role is being misinterpreted, pointing out that he bowled only a single over in the first innings and was effectively treated as a primary batter. He questioned the logic of picking him as a fourth spinner when the team clearly didn’t need him in that capacity. According to Pujara, this reduces the balance of the XI and places Sundar in an unfamiliar responsibility that might not align with his strengths.
Instead, Pujara backed young Sai Sudharsan for the No. 3 role, citing his steady performances in England and the West Indies. He believes Sudharsan was developing well and deserved a consistent run to establish himself as a specialist top-order option. With India searching for long-term stability in that position, Pujara felt this match was a missed opportunity for the youngster to build a significant innings.
Sundar, meanwhile, held firm with KL Rahul after the early dismissal of Yashasvi Jaiswal late on Day 1. As he prepares to resume on the second morning, the all-rounder carries the pressure of proving that he can handle one of the most demanding batting roles in Test cricket.
